Thinking of the store where you do most of your grocery shopping, how would you rate the affordability of their fresh fruits and vegetables?
Pitt County, 2000


Demographic
Groups

Total
Respond.#
Very affordable
 
N       %   C.I.(95%)
Somewhat affordable
 
N       %   C.I.(95%)
Not affordable
 
N       %   C.I.(95%)
TOTAL 296 67  22.8  (18.0-28.5) 216  73.3  (67.4-78.4) 13   3.9  ( 2.2- 7.0)
SEX        
Male 129 31  23.2  (16.3-31.8)  94  73.6  (64.7-81.0)  4   3.2  ( 1.1- 8.9)
Female 167 36  22.5  (16.2-30.4) 122  73.0  (64.9-79.8)  9   4.5  ( 2.2- 9.1)
RACE        
White 206 44  21.7  (16.1-28.5) 155  75.3  (68.3-81.2)  7   3.0  ( 1.3- 6.7)
Other  84 21  24.8  (16.0-36.2)  57  68.9  (57.1-78.6)  6   6.4  ( 2.7-14.5)
AGE        
18-44 162 34  20.8  (14.9-28.3) 122  75.8  (68.0-82.2)  6   3.4  ( 1.4- 7.9)
45+ 133 32  25.4  (18.0-34.6)  94  69.8  (60.5-77.8)  7   4.7  ( 2.1-10.4)
EDUCATION        
<=H.S./GED 114 27  23.6  (16.2-33.1)  79  70.4  (60.5-78.7)  8   6.0  ( 2.8-12.4)
Any Post-H.S. 181 40  22.4  (16.4-29.8) 136  75.0  (67.4-81.2)  5   2.6  ( 1.0- 6.8)
HOUSEHOLD INCOME        
Less than $35,000 143 36  26.9  (19.5-36.0)  98  68.4  (59.3-76.3)  9   4.7  ( 2.4- 9.0)
$35,000+ 112 24  22.3  (15.0-31.7)  86  76.2  (66.7-83.6)  2   1.5  ( 0.4- 6.4)
DISABILITY STATUS        
Any Disability  86 15  16.4  ( 9.5-26.9)  65  76.0  (64.5-84.7)  6   7.6  ( 3.2-17.2)
No Disability 207 51  25.5  (19.5-32.5) 149  72.1  (65.0-78.2)  7   2.5  ( 1.1- 5.3)

#Use caution in interpreting cell sizes less than 50. N = Cell Size, % = Percentage, C.I.(95%) = Confidence Interval (at 95 percent probability level).
Percentages are weighted to population characteristics.